Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Rape Seed

Palin is apparently in support of rape. In addition to opposing abortion in cases where women are raped. [Ed: why should a baby be punished for the sins of the father?]. She apparently was in favor of charging women who sought a rape kit. [Ed: why should the father be punished for sins of the father?].

Makes sense.

Really the bottom line is that women should be married or getting married and that their husbands or fiances should be protecting them from rape. Only women who aren't real women who are with men who aren't real men get raped. Praise Jesus.

Going to read that one bible story about the two daughters who hooked up with their dad again. So hot!

2 comments:

Fungster said...

There was a line item in the budget that she signed with money provided for rape kits. Someone else didn't use the budget and instead charged for the rape kits. This one sounds a little flimsy to me - you'd have to show that someone brought to her attention that victims were being charged and she did nothing about it. What she signed provided the money - I don't see how she can be expected to check to make sure that every single thing on the budget was spent properly - especially if it came under budget. Next!

Ranger said...

Number one, the police chief appears to have been pretty vocal about it. Number two, I don't know how to reconcile her opposition to abortion in cases of rape to anything other than hatred of women. I mean I understand there is a conflict of rights, but she is saying that the mother's rights are always subservient to those of the baby (unless she is going to die). To me she is making a choice to pen women in to baby-machines. If that's what she wants, I suggest she spend more time fucking her husband and less time fucking the American people.