Showing posts with label things Smiffs don't like. Show all posts
Showing posts with label things Smiffs don't like. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Monday, July 28, 2008

I fell asleep in the middle of posting this

On the other hand, for fans of yellow cards, there were fireworks aplenty.

Final
Chicago 0
Kansas City 0

Substitutions
CHICAGO SUBSTITUTION: Patrick Nyarko for Tomasz Frankowski in the 62nd minute
CHICAGO SUBSTITUTION: Stephen King for Chris Rolfe in the 77th minute
KANSAS CITY SUBSTITUTION: Nelson Pizarro for Aaron Hohlbein in the 80th minute
KANSAS CITY SUBSTITUTION: Ryan Pore for Josh Wolff in the 84th minute
KANSAS CITY SUBSTITUTION: Ivan Trujillo for Claudio Lopez in the 84th minute
CHICAGO SUBSTITUTION: Daniel Woolard for Gonzalo Segares in the 89th minute

Yellow Cards
CHICAGO CAUTION: Bakary Soumare in the 21st minute
CHICAGO CAUTION: Diego Gutierrez in the 55th minute
CHICAGO CAUTION: Cuauhtemoc Blanco in the 57th minute
KANSAS CITY CAUTION: Roger Espinoza in the 59th minute

Monday, April 7, 2008

i pfink dis could be shocking but what da pfokk do i know?

Superior_Standings
Slingers 5 1 .833
Edgewater Smelts 5 1 .833
Three Putts 2 4 .333
Hillcrest Hummingbirds 1 5 .167

Friday, April 4, 2008

which is more shocking?

Bluestem and Maddogs tied for 7th, or this?

1. Blue Ward Cyclones 197.5
2. shot_at_bill 179
3. Lord Viper Elefantes 171.5

Monday, January 28, 2008

Apparently, there was a golf tournament here and Tigers Woods won! And they're coming back in June!!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

As George Carlin once said, "I'd rather watch flies fuck."

Monday, January 14, 2008

philly skilly phlubs da phorecast

Snow? No!
By Lea Sitton Stanley
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
So, where is it, that snow we steeled ourselves for?
"It didn't happen."

k-mad, reporting from da philly aeroport...

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Sunday, December 2, 2007

sKILLy nails annudder one

The Chicago area emerged from its first wintry cocktail of snow and sleet Sunday after a weekend storm that began with snow, followed by sleet and freezing rain, before changing finally to rain only, in the precise quantities and at the exact hours as forecast by Tom "sKILLy" Skilling, WGN and Chicago Tribune meteorologist and soothsayer.

"Everything was revealed exactly as I prophesied," sKILLy said. "In my line of work, you put up with your share of doubters, haters, whiners, and naysayers, but when you're on top of your game, none of that affects you," he said.

"Smiff can bite me," he added.

Friday, November 30, 2007

is this precise enough for you, SMIFF?

Messy winter storm bears down on Chicago

Of the estimated 1.22" water equivalent precipitation the approaching storm may produce here later Saturday and Sunday, temperature profiles of the atmosphere above Chicago as it passes suggest around 17% may falls as ice pellets or some snow, 33% is to fall as freezing rain and 50% is to fall as rain.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

it's the same all over

From the Minneapolis-St.Paul Star-Tribune (Legislation Cmte work takes me to the far-flung reaches of the internets):

Snow on Saturday, but how much?

"The jury is still out," James McQuarter of the National Weather Service said today. "It’s kind of early to tell. There are some conflicting models. Right now it’s just hard to say."

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Things Smiff Doesn't Like (cont'd)

It all boils down to this:

1) Man's inhumanity to man.
2) The Bush Administration.
3) The New England Patriots.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Smiff done with 24

I watched 24 because it was entertaining (yet completely ridiculous), but last season TOTALLY SUCKED, and the "torture method of the week" got really tired. (I also read that they're bringing back a character somehow WHO WAS KILLED, and turning him from a "good guy" to a "bad guy"). Then there's this moron:

“24″ Creator Thinks Clinton As President “Is Nuts”
The man who has created several presidents for the hit TV show “24″ says it’s “nuts” to think of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton being the next real president.
“I’m not even sure that Hillary is a fait accompli [to be the Democratic nominee] at this point,” Joel Surnow, the executive producer of the Fox show, told reporters and bloggers over the weekend, according to the Washington Times. “Are we nuts thinking Hillary Clinton could be president of this country?”
“Honest to God, just stand back and think about it,” he added.


Well, she ain't my first choice, and maybe not even my 6th, but after eight years of you-know-who it's hard to think that just about ANYONE* elected could be considered "nuts." What's nuts is what's been going on the last 7 years. Has Surnow been producing the show from France or somewhere? Honest to God, does he know who is president RIGHT NOW? So if the writers' strike ends and 24 does come back, Joel Surnow can take the first script, shove it up his @$$, and phokk off while doing it.

*I'm talking serious candidates on both sides, not total nutjobs like Tancredo and Hunter with less than 1% support.

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Ma Smiff on the Fightins

"That thrown together line-up did pretty good today but the pitching is pathetic. We need more pitchers who can find the plate. Hope the Braves lose tonight."

Smiffs don't like pitchers who can't throw strikes. You can add dat to the long list of things we don't like. We also don't like the Atlanta phokking Braves and New York phokking Mets. HATE, in fact.