The change "is a product of our ongoing effort to use language that describes the conflict for our Western audience while understanding the cultural implications of how that language is construed in the Middle East," Lt. Col. Matthew McLaughlin, a spokesman for the command, said in an e-mail message.
Wow... dude talks all faggy an s#i+ for a Lieutenant Colonel... I thought da RezzziDUNCE wanted us to mistrust people who could think and s#i+?
I phink what he's sayin is we need to figger out a way to bulls#i+ the American public into numb resignation without getting our @**es blown off jihadi-style...
3 comments:
I say they call it "the mild 5 thousand year old disagreement that had partially scabbed over before we tore it open so that the military industrial complex and the oil companies could reap hyooooge profits."
Didya see Dumbya's news conference yesterday? "Last November, the American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in our strategy in Iraq. I listened. Today, General David Petraeus is carrying out a strategy that is dramatically different from our previous course..."
So the new "strategy," the troop surge, all the dead people, is just a reflection of the American people's wishes.
In udder words, the inevitable failure will be your fault, not his.
Unbelievable. The American people said they were frustrated and wanted a change in strategy in Iraq? No they didn't. They said that they are fed up with the whole moronic adventure and that our involvement should end. In Bushworld that means escalation.
Post a Comment