Oh yeah, Commish ASSFACE made $18 MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEllion last year to SUCK.
Hmmm, no plain and simple Bud Selig SUCKS facegroup. Could be my calling.
Bud Selig should be fired as MLB Commissioner
412 members
Bud Selig is a douche
136 members
Bud Selig should suck a wang.
81 members
Fire Bud Selig
68 members
Bud Selig is the Antichrist
69 members
F**K Bud Selig
63 members
Fuck Bud Selig
54 members
Bud Selig can suck it, we had game 5 won easily.. (Phillies group!)
33 members
1,000,000 people that think Bud Selig is the worst commisioner ever (at least 29 do)
29 members
Baseball fans for the removal of Bud Selig as head of MLB
28 members
I hate bud selig for making astros play in Milwaukee
24 members
bud selig is a retarded bitch
23 members
1,000,000 Fans to Impeach Bud Selig (or 21)
21 members
Start New Fire Bud Selig
17 members
BUD SELIG: Enemy of Baseball
16 members
Fire Bud Selig
13 members
Bud Selig Is An Assclown - Fire Him!!!
11 members
Bud Selig and Barry Bonds can go to Hell together
9 members
Bud Selig NEEDS to resign/be fired
9 members
Way to go Bud Selig..... yea right......
8 members
Bud Selig blew it!
8 members
Allan H. Selig...He's Not Our Bud
Network: SIU Edwardsville
7 members
Why did Bar/Bri hire Bud Selig to teach the Con Law lectures? (HUH?)
7 members
Bud Selig- One giant bag of douche
4 members
FIRE BUD SELIG!!!!!!!
3 members
Bud Selig is a complete jackass
3 members
Bud Selig for President...'08.
2 members
Bud Selig, Worst MLB Commissioner Ever
1 member
Showing posts with label Douchebag. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Douchebag. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Friday, December 5, 2008
The ever changing Fung
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Nobody Likes The World's Biggest Douchebag
World leaders refuse to shake Bush's hand
CNN Anchor Rick Sanchez: Bush looks like "the most unpopular kid in high school that nobody liked."
CNN Anchor Rick Sanchez: Bush looks like "the most unpopular kid in high school that nobody liked."
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Robert Novak: Douchebag, Treasonist, Reality-Denier
No mandate for Obama, no lopsided Congress
November 5, 2008
ROBERT NOVAK* novakevans@aol.com
WASHINGTON -- The national election Tuesday was not only historic for the election of the first African-American president in the nation's history but also for how little the avalanche of Democratic votes changed the political alignment in Congress.
The first Democratic Electoral College landslide in decades did not result in a tight race for control of Congress.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt won his second term for president in 1936, the defeated Republican candidate, Gov. Alf Landon of Kansas, won only two states, Maine and Vermont, and Democrats controlled both houses of Congress by wide margins.
But Obama's win was nothing like that. He may have opened the door to enactment of the long-deferred liberal agenda, but he neither received a broad mandate from the public nor the needed large congressional majorities.
The Democrats fell several votes short of the 60-vote filibuster-proof Senate that they were seeking and also failed to get rid of a key Senate target: Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
Republicans, though discouraged by the election's outcome, believe Obama will be hard-pressed not so much to enact his agenda but to keep his popular majority, which he considers centrist, as he moves to enact ultra-liberal legislation, particularly the demands of organized labor.
*Douchebag.
________________
[11/06/04]
Q: Bob Novak, is 51 percent of the vote really a mandate?
NOVAK: Of course it is. It’s a 3.5 million vote margin. But the people who are saying that it isn’t a mandate are the same people who were predicting that John Kerry would win. … So the people who say there’s not a mandate want the president, now that he’s won, to say, Oh, we’re going to accept the liberalism that the — that the voters rejected. But Mark, this is a conservative country, and it showed it on last Tuesday.
So in Bob's World, a Republican mandate comes from a win of any kind, but a Democratic mandate would have only come from Obama winning every state but Utah, Wyoming and Oklahoma...
~
November 5, 2008
ROBERT NOVAK* novakevans@aol.com
WASHINGTON -- The national election Tuesday was not only historic for the election of the first African-American president in the nation's history but also for how little the avalanche of Democratic votes changed the political alignment in Congress.
The first Democratic Electoral College landslide in decades did not result in a tight race for control of Congress.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt won his second term for president in 1936, the defeated Republican candidate, Gov. Alf Landon of Kansas, won only two states, Maine and Vermont, and Democrats controlled both houses of Congress by wide margins.
But Obama's win was nothing like that. He may have opened the door to enactment of the long-deferred liberal agenda, but he neither received a broad mandate from the public nor the needed large congressional majorities.
The Democrats fell several votes short of the 60-vote filibuster-proof Senate that they were seeking and also failed to get rid of a key Senate target: Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
Republicans, though discouraged by the election's outcome, believe Obama will be hard-pressed not so much to enact his agenda but to keep his popular majority, which he considers centrist, as he moves to enact ultra-liberal legislation, particularly the demands of organized labor.
*Douchebag.
________________
[11/06/04]
Q: Bob Novak, is 51 percent of the vote really a mandate?
NOVAK: Of course it is. It’s a 3.5 million vote margin. But the people who are saying that it isn’t a mandate are the same people who were predicting that John Kerry would win. … So the people who say there’s not a mandate want the president, now that he’s won, to say, Oh, we’re going to accept the liberalism that the — that the voters rejected. But Mark, this is a conservative country, and it showed it on last Tuesday.
So in Bob's World, a Republican mandate comes from a win of any kind, but a Democratic mandate would have only come from Obama winning every state but Utah, Wyoming and Oklahoma...
~
Friday, October 24, 2008
did Smiff write this?
FEY AS PALIN - "We are gonna get 'er done."
FERRELL AS BUSH - "My God you are folksy."
FEY AS PALIN - "Why thank you Mr. President. I like to think I'm one part practiced folksy, one part sassy and a little dash of high school bitchy."
FERRELL AS BUSH - "For a little while I was trying to be folksy but after a bit, it just came off douchey.
FERRELL AS BUSH - "My God you are folksy."
FEY AS PALIN - "Why thank you Mr. President. I like to think I'm one part practiced folksy, one part sassy and a little dash of high school bitchy."
FERRELL AS BUSH - "For a little while I was trying to be folksy but after a bit, it just came off douchey.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Friday, September 19, 2008
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Friday, August 8, 2008
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
A Terrible Word to Lose
This deplorable error in an Associated Press wire dispatch Monday is surely the result of the demise of copy editors in the news business. The wire carried news of conservative political commentator Robert D. Novak -- who, by the way, was always gracious and helpful to us, despite his cranky public persona -- and his retirement from the biz after he was diagnosed with a brain tumor.
And then a terrible gaffe: "Novak has been a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times for decades. He announced late last month he has a brain."
And then a terrible gaffe: "Novak has been a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times for decades. He announced late last month he has a brain."
Monday, July 21, 2008
Charles Krauthammer: A Douchebag of Liberty
Obama isn't close to earning his stripes
...has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?
Smiff's response at the soon-to-be slimmer, news-free Trib:
That would be the current president, a man I am sure Krauthammer voted for twice. Bush 43 had ZERO accomplishments as governor or in business, but that was good enough for Mr. Krauthammer in 2000 and 2004. Bush proceeded to become the worst president we've ever had, and it's not even close. While Obama might be inexperieced, he at least has something that Bush has never had: intellect and a brain. McCain does have this, but agrees with Bush on nearly every issue. Krauthammer wants more of that? How do morons like this still have nationally syndicated columns??
...has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?
Smiff's response at the soon-to-be slimmer, news-free Trib:
That would be the current president, a man I am sure Krauthammer voted for twice. Bush 43 had ZERO accomplishments as governor or in business, but that was good enough for Mr. Krauthammer in 2000 and 2004. Bush proceeded to become the worst president we've ever had, and it's not even close. While Obama might be inexperieced, he at least has something that Bush has never had: intellect and a brain. McCain does have this, but agrees with Bush on nearly every issue. Krauthammer wants more of that? How do morons like this still have nationally syndicated columns??
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Huh? But that's not what 'the pundits' said
Poll: Obama's 'bitter' comment having little impact on Pa. race
And i love it when millionaire douchebags like Pat Buchanan and George Will call someone an elitist...
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
