Bush defends US record on Darfur
US President George W Bush has defended his decision not to send troops to the Sudanese region of Darfur, despite what he calls a genocide taking place there.
He called it a "seminal decision" not to intervene with force, taken partly out of the desire not to send US troops into another Muslim country.
Well, now we know. There's a 'quota' on how many Muslim countries we can be in at any given time. No wonder Iran's going nuts - they know we can't invade or we'd go over the quota and what, the world would end? So if we pulled out of Iraq, then we could go into Darfur?
Or perhaps this is because of the unfortunate use of the word "crusade" earlier on in the Presidency? Now we can't go into a country that's had issues between a Muslim north and Christian south?
Or are the Sudanese too dark to spill our blood over? I mean, they do have oil there...
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Bu$#!+ometer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Well you see they're probably funding and arming both sides in Sudan (see 1980's Sunni and Shi'ite) and intervening would kill the money train.
I'd give the man $1000 if he could find Darfur on a map.
He thinks it's Dark Fur.
Post a Comment